We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
AEM vs. NEM: Which Gold Mining Giant Should You Invest in Now?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Agnico Eagle is advancing key projects while boosting cash flow, buybacks and dividends.
NEM expanded liquidity and free cash flow as it ramps up Ahafo North production.
Both miners are exposed to higher production costs in 2026, weighing on margins.
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM - Free Report) and Newmont Corporation (NEM - Free Report) are two prominent players in the gold mining space with global operations and diversified portfolios. Although gold prices have retreated sharply from their January 2026 peak, they continue to remain at supportive levels. Against this backdrop, comparing the two industry giants is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals sector.
Heightened geopolitical tensions, a weaker U.S. dollar, tariff-related concerns and concerns surrounding the Federal Reserve’s independence had driven bullion to a record high of nearly $5,600 per ounce in late January. Since then gold has pulled back sharply due to rising inflation concerns triggered by a surge in crude oil prices amid persistent Middle East tensions and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, with prices falling to $4,500 per ounce last week. Bullion has recovered toward $4,600 per ounce lately on prospects of a U.S.-Iran deal.
Let’s dive deep and closely compare the fundamentals of these two mining giants to determine which one is a better investment now.
The Case for Agnico Eagle
Agnico Eagle is focused on executing projects that are expected to provide additional growth in production and cash flows. It is advancing its key value drivers and pipeline projects, including the Odyssey project in the Canadian Malartic Complex, Detour Lake, Hope Bay, Upper Beaver and San Nicolas.
The merger with Kirkland Lake Gold established Agnico Eagle as the industry's highest-quality senior gold producer. The integrated entity now has an extensive pipeline of development and exploration projects to drive sustainable growth. It also has the financial flexibility to fund a strong pipeline of growth projects.
AEM has a robust liquidity position and generates substantial cash flows, which enable it to maintain a strong exploration budget, finance a strong pipeline of growth projects, pay down debt and drive shareholder value. Its operating cash flow for full-year 2025 was a record $6.8 billion, driven by operational efficiencies. Operating cash flow was roughly $1.3 billion in the first quarter, up around 29% from the year-ago quarter.
AEM’s first-quarter free cash flow climbed 23% year over year to roughly $732 million. The upside was backed by the strength in gold prices and robust operational results. The company remains focused on paying down debt using excess cash, with total long-term debt reducing by roughly $950 million in 2025. The company had a long-term debt of $197 million at the end of the first quarter. It ended the quarter with a significant net cash position of roughly $2.9 billion, driven by an increase in cash.
AEM also returned around $1.4 billion to its shareholders in 2025 and $375 million in the first quarter of 2026 through dividends and share buybacks. It raised its quarterly dividend by 12.5% to 45 cents per share. AEM offers a dividend yield of 1% at the current stock price. It has a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of 2.7%. AEM has a payout ratio of 18%.
Agnico Eagle remains exposed to higher production costs. Its all-in-sustaining costs (AISC) — a critical cost metric for miners — were $1,483 per ounce in the first quarter, marking a roughly 26% year-over-year rise. AISC increased year over year due to higher total cash costs and an uptick in sustaining capital expenditures. Total cash costs per ounce for gold were $1,093, 22% higher than $895 a year ago. Total cash costs rose due to increased royalty costs and lower production.
AEM forecasts total cash costs per ounce in the range of $1,020 to $1,120 and AISC per ounce between $1,400 and $1,550 for 2026, suggesting a year-over-year increase at the midpoint of the respective ranges. Cash costs are expected to increase in 2026, partly due to higher royalty costs, cost inflation (including higher labor and electricity costs) and lower grades across certain mines. Higher production costs warrant caution, as they will likely weigh on AEM’s profitability.
The Case for Newmont
Newmont continues to invest in growth projects in a calculated manner. The company is pursuing several projects, including the Cadia Panel Caves and Tanami Expansion 2 in Australia. These projects should expand Newmont’s production capacity and extend mine life, driving revenues and profits.
In October 2025, NEM achieved a significant milestone at Ahafo North. It achieved commercial production at the project, which followed the first gold pour in September 2025. Ahafo North is expected to produce between 275,000 and 325,000 ounces of gold annually over an estimated mine life of 13 years. Output is expected to be 315,000 ounces this year, with a ramp-up to full capacity.
Newmont has a strong liquidity position and generates substantial cash flows, which allow it to fund its growth projects, meet short-term debt obligations and drive shareholder value. At the end of the first quarter of 2026, Newmont had robust liquidity of roughly $12.8 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of around $8.8 billion. Its free cash flow surged 161% year over year to a record $3.1 billion in the first quarter, led by an increase in net cash from operating activities. Net cash from operating activities amounted to $3.8 billion in the first quarter, up from $2 billion in the year-ago quarter.
NEM has distributed $3.4 billion to its shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in 2025. It has returned $2.7 billion to its shareholders since Feb. 19, 2026. Newmont has executed repurchases of $6 billion under the earlier authorized share purchase programs, including $2.4 billion since the fourth-quarter 2025 earnings call. Its board has approved an additional $6 billion repurchase program. NEM offers a dividend yield of 1% at the current stock price. Its payout ratio is 12%.
Newmont also remains committed to deleveraging, reducing debt by roughly $3.4 billion in 2025. It also reduced debt by an additional $42 million in the first quarter, resulting in a strong net cash position of $3.2 billion.
NEM saw lower gold production for the first quarter of 2026, partly linked to its strategic divestment of non-core assets. NEM reported a roughly 16% year-over-year and 10% sequential decline in attributable gold production to 1.3 million ounces. Newmont expects second-quarter 2026 production to be below the first-quarter level.
The company anticipates gold production at about 5.26 million ounces for 2026, indicating a year-over-year decline from 5.89 million ounces in 2025. NEM expects lower production from Penasquito and Cadia in 2026 due to the site transitions. It also sees lower-than-expected production from Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo. These will be partly offset by contributions from the newly commissioned Ahafo North mine.
Lower production is also expected to lead to higher unit costs in 2026. NEM expects AISC to be $1,680 per ounce on a by-product basis, a notable increase from $1,358 per ounce in 2025. The expected increase is due to lower sales volumes as a result of planned mine sequencing, higher royalties and production taxes, deferral of sustaining capital from 2025 into 2026 and inventory changes.
AEM & NEM: Price Performance, Valuation & Other Comparisons
AEM stock has popped 49.6% over the past year, while NEM stock has racked up a gain of 100.6% compared with the Zacks Mining – Gold industry’s increase of 63.7%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
AEM is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 13.29, lower than its five-year median. This represents a 26.5% premium when stacked up with the industry average of 10.51X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Newmont is trading at a discount to Agnico Eagle. The NEM stock is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 10.81, lower than its five-year median and modestly above the industry.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
NEM’s return on equity (ROE) of 27.8% is higher than AEM’s 21.1%. This reflects Newmont’s efficient use of shareholder funds in generating profits.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
How Does Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for AEM & NEM?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AEM’s 2026 sales and EPS implies a year-over-year rise of 39.4% and 58.7%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2026 have been trending lower over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The consensus estimate for NEM’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 21.4% and 37.5%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2026 have been trending northward over the past 60 days.
Both Agnico Eagle and Newmont are well-positioned to benefit from the favorable gold pricing environment, each demonstrating strong financial performance and commitment to shareholder returns. Both have a strong pipeline of development projects and solid financial health. NEM’s higher ROE indicates that it is more effectively utilizing shareholder funds. In addition, NEM’s cheap valuation offers an attractive entry point. Investors seeking exposure to the gold space might consider Newmont as the more favorable option at this time.
Zacks' 7 Best Strong Buy Stocks (New Research Report)
Valued at $99, click below to receive our just-released report
predicting the 7 stocks that will soar highest in the coming month.
Image: Bigstock
AEM vs. NEM: Which Gold Mining Giant Should You Invest in Now?
Key Takeaways
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM - Free Report) and Newmont Corporation (NEM - Free Report) are two prominent players in the gold mining space with global operations and diversified portfolios. Although gold prices have retreated sharply from their January 2026 peak, they continue to remain at supportive levels. Against this backdrop, comparing the two industry giants is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals sector.
Heightened geopolitical tensions, a weaker U.S. dollar, tariff-related concerns and concerns surrounding the Federal Reserve’s independence had driven bullion to a record high of nearly $5,600 per ounce in late January. Since then gold has pulled back sharply due to rising inflation concerns triggered by a surge in crude oil prices amid persistent Middle East tensions and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, with prices falling to $4,500 per ounce last week. Bullion has recovered toward $4,600 per ounce lately on prospects of a U.S.-Iran deal.
Let’s dive deep and closely compare the fundamentals of these two mining giants to determine which one is a better investment now.
The Case for Agnico Eagle
Agnico Eagle is focused on executing projects that are expected to provide additional growth in production and cash flows. It is advancing its key value drivers and pipeline projects, including the Odyssey project in the Canadian Malartic Complex, Detour Lake, Hope Bay, Upper Beaver and San Nicolas.
The merger with Kirkland Lake Gold established Agnico Eagle as the industry's highest-quality senior gold producer. The integrated entity now has an extensive pipeline of development and exploration projects to drive sustainable growth. It also has the financial flexibility to fund a strong pipeline of growth projects.
AEM has a robust liquidity position and generates substantial cash flows, which enable it to maintain a strong exploration budget, finance a strong pipeline of growth projects, pay down debt and drive shareholder value. Its operating cash flow for full-year 2025 was a record $6.8 billion, driven by operational efficiencies. Operating cash flow was roughly $1.3 billion in the first quarter, up around 29% from the year-ago quarter.
AEM’s first-quarter free cash flow climbed 23% year over year to roughly $732 million. The upside was backed by the strength in gold prices and robust operational results. The company remains focused on paying down debt using excess cash, with total long-term debt reducing by roughly $950 million in 2025. The company had a long-term debt of $197 million at the end of the first quarter. It ended the quarter with a significant net cash position of roughly $2.9 billion, driven by an increase in cash.
AEM also returned around $1.4 billion to its shareholders in 2025 and $375 million in the first quarter of 2026 through dividends and share buybacks. It raised its quarterly dividend by 12.5% to 45 cents per share. AEM offers a dividend yield of 1% at the current stock price. It has a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of 2.7%. AEM has a payout ratio of 18%.
Agnico Eagle remains exposed to higher production costs. Its all-in-sustaining costs (AISC) — a critical cost metric for miners — were $1,483 per ounce in the first quarter, marking a roughly 26% year-over-year rise. AISC increased year over year due to higher total cash costs and an uptick in sustaining capital expenditures. Total cash costs per ounce for gold were $1,093, 22% higher than $895 a year ago. Total cash costs rose due to increased royalty costs and lower production.
AEM forecasts total cash costs per ounce in the range of $1,020 to $1,120 and AISC per ounce between $1,400 and $1,550 for 2026, suggesting a year-over-year increase at the midpoint of the respective ranges. Cash costs are expected to increase in 2026, partly due to higher royalty costs, cost inflation (including higher labor and electricity costs) and lower grades across certain mines. Higher production costs warrant caution, as they will likely weigh on AEM’s profitability.
The Case for Newmont
Newmont continues to invest in growth projects in a calculated manner. The company is pursuing several projects, including the Cadia Panel Caves and Tanami Expansion 2 in Australia. These projects should expand Newmont’s production capacity and extend mine life, driving revenues and profits.
In October 2025, NEM achieved a significant milestone at Ahafo North. It achieved commercial production at the project, which followed the first gold pour in September 2025. Ahafo North is expected to produce between 275,000 and 325,000 ounces of gold annually over an estimated mine life of 13 years. Output is expected to be 315,000 ounces this year, with a ramp-up to full capacity.
Newmont has a strong liquidity position and generates substantial cash flows, which allow it to fund its growth projects, meet short-term debt obligations and drive shareholder value. At the end of the first quarter of 2026, Newmont had robust liquidity of roughly $12.8 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of around $8.8 billion. Its free cash flow surged 161% year over year to a record $3.1 billion in the first quarter, led by an increase in net cash from operating activities. Net cash from operating activities amounted to $3.8 billion in the first quarter, up from $2 billion in the year-ago quarter.
NEM has distributed $3.4 billion to its shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in 2025. It has returned $2.7 billion to its shareholders since Feb. 19, 2026. Newmont has executed repurchases of $6 billion under the earlier authorized share purchase programs, including $2.4 billion since the fourth-quarter 2025 earnings call. Its board has approved an additional $6 billion repurchase program. NEM offers a dividend yield of 1% at the current stock price. Its payout ratio is 12%.
Newmont also remains committed to deleveraging, reducing debt by roughly $3.4 billion in 2025. It also reduced debt by an additional $42 million in the first quarter, resulting in a strong net cash position of $3.2 billion.
NEM saw lower gold production for the first quarter of 2026, partly linked to its strategic divestment of non-core assets. NEM reported a roughly 16% year-over-year and 10% sequential decline in attributable gold production to 1.3 million ounces. Newmont expects second-quarter 2026 production to be below the first-quarter level.
The company anticipates gold production at about 5.26 million ounces for 2026, indicating a year-over-year decline from 5.89 million ounces in 2025. NEM expects lower production from Penasquito and Cadia in 2026 due to the site transitions. It also sees lower-than-expected production from Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo. These will be partly offset by contributions from the newly commissioned Ahafo North mine.
Lower production is also expected to lead to higher unit costs in 2026. NEM expects AISC to be $1,680 per ounce on a by-product basis, a notable increase from $1,358 per ounce in 2025. The expected increase is due to lower sales volumes as a result of planned mine sequencing, higher royalties and production taxes, deferral of sustaining capital from 2025 into 2026 and inventory changes.
AEM & NEM: Price Performance, Valuation & Other Comparisons
AEM stock has popped 49.6% over the past year, while NEM stock has racked up a gain of 100.6% compared with the Zacks Mining – Gold industry’s increase of 63.7%.
AEM is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 13.29, lower than its five-year median. This represents a 26.5% premium when stacked up with the industry average of 10.51X.
Newmont is trading at a discount to Agnico Eagle. The NEM stock is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 10.81, lower than its five-year median and modestly above the industry.
NEM’s return on equity (ROE) of 27.8% is higher than AEM’s 21.1%. This reflects Newmont’s efficient use of shareholder funds in generating profits.
How Does Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for AEM & NEM?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AEM’s 2026 sales and EPS implies a year-over-year rise of 39.4% and 58.7%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2026 have been trending lower over the past 60 days.
The consensus estimate for NEM’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 21.4% and 37.5%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2026 have been trending northward over the past 60 days.
AEM or NEM: Which Is a Better Pick?
Both AEM and NEM currently have a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) each, so picking one stock is not easy. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Both Agnico Eagle and Newmont are well-positioned to benefit from the favorable gold pricing environment, each demonstrating strong financial performance and commitment to shareholder returns. Both have a strong pipeline of development projects and solid financial health. NEM’s higher ROE indicates that it is more effectively utilizing shareholder funds. In addition, NEM’s cheap valuation offers an attractive entry point. Investors seeking exposure to the gold space might consider Newmont as the more favorable option at this time.